THE OCCIDENT AND IDENTITY: TWO YEARS LATER

In this contribution, Dr Sid Lukkassen, an individual member from The Netherlands, asks whether his book, written in Dutch and published two years ago, Avondland en Identiteit, is still relevant today. Risen to prominence in recent times in Dutch public debate, Sid in his book pleas for a political strategy and identity that is rooted in self-confidence, while also contemplating the question of the role liberalism plays in the decline as well as in any possible renaissance. 

As a young city council member for the VVD, I made my debut in 2015 with the book Avondland and Identiteit (Aspekt). The book draws attention from influential people. Prime Minister Mark Rutte posed with it while Dr Thierry Baudet wrote the introduction for the reprint. I was invited to speak in the European Parliament by ALDE Party individual members. Applying its analysis on Europe today: is it still relevant?

‘Avondland’ (in German: Abendland) is the overarching concept for the culture of the European civilization. The Abendland signifies the western sphere where the sun disappears after sunset. For the European Union, this sunset may be proverbial: thinking about Brexit, the debt crisis in the southern member states, and the discussion about constitutional reforms in Poland. Together with the migration crisis, these factors create the perfect storm that could end the European Union.

European self-esteem

The book is my plea for a political strategy and identity that is rooted in self-confidence while also contemplating the question of the role liberalism plays in the decline as well as in any possible renaissance. When I published the book in 2015, I was optimistic about the European project – marching Russian boots, the threat of Islamic extremism, China’s neo-colonialism and ethnical tensions in our cities would be the wake-up call for European citizens and their representatives. My expectation was that within a few years, Europe would restore its self-esteem and through that formulate a realistic approach to geopolitics.

The opposite has happened. By manipulating the migration crisis and European feelings of guilt, while supporting its ‘storm troopers’ in European cities, Turkish President Erdogan  blackmails the European Commission. The idea of a solid foreign policy through the unity of Europe has failed completely. Despite the acquisition of bonds by the ECB, monetary easing and the European Stability Mechanism, the economic outlooks are grim as well. Great amounts of financial aid are flowing back to financial institutions instead of helping economies in need. The resulting inflation damages the middle-class and their savings. In the midst of this, the British have lost all hope and resigned from the project.

The end of liberty

The explanation of the rise in popularity of Trump, Farage, Hofer or Beppe Grillo by mainstream political parties and media remains one-sided without self-reflection. These forces immediately claim the role of authentic moral resistance, while at the same time promoting the interests of the increasingly distrusted status quo.

Meanwhile, Merkel, Timmermans, and Zuckerberg cooperate to “eliminate hate speech on the internet”, aided by others such as Google CEO Eric Schmidt and George Soros. The latter financially supports Correctiv, which is supported by Facebook and German law to “remove messages from doubtful origins”, especially “negative stories on migrants”. Who determines what is fake news and what is truth? Who defines these criteria is ultimately a question of political power. People who haven’t experienced higher education, and who fail to voice their concerns adequately, will be frightened to voice their opinions due to this imminent censorship. They will be disconnected from the political debate and take their revenge in the voting booth.

Those we call “elite” today –those in control of the judicial systems, top-ranking public officials, media-moguls and CEOs – do not experience the negative consequences of these changes. They live in a safe and wealthy environment; their children enjoy the best education. They are mobile and are always able to escape the situation that may arise if civil society collapses. Psychiatrist Dr Esther van Fenema published about the cosmopolitan elite: the view of highly educated people in secure office buildings. From their privileged position, they survey the burkas that slowly but steadily fill the streets.

Ethnical tensions and economic resentment 

In Brussels I could see it with my own eyes. At the Berlaymont, where European Commission civil servants work, a secured parking garage was built. Made possible by the taxpayer. The rest of the people have to park somewhere on the streets. If damages to property occur, perhaps due to vandalism, the people request better law enforcement and more police. In response, they will hear that they should not “live their lives in fear”, that they have a “authoritarian worldview”, and they should “open their hearts towards their fellow men”. At the end of the day, these officials drive out of the secured parking lots. I mention this anecdotal evidence so that you may recognize the rhetoric and understand the class interests that are the basis for these statements.

Besides the ever increasing ethnical tensions within Europe, the economic resentment creates another problem: the disappearing of small retail, where the young used to gain their first working experiences in order to become middle class later in life. It is there where they learned the work ethics that defined the middle class. Nowadays these small business are replaced by multinationals that can avoid taxation through mailbox companies and legal loopholes.

Better prospects of work do not elevate the position of the young, but instead they are worsened through zero-hour contracts and financially inadequate internships/traineeships. In all the LYMEC and ALDE conferences I have attended between my twenties and thirties, I seldom heard young representatives voice this concern, which defines the struggle of our generation. These traineeships are being sold as “investment in your career”, while they supress their income and compete with workers who have completed the same education and now have to pay off their loans. This situation is detrimental for the formation of families – a vital topic I see ignored by many young cosmopolitans, which in turn increases the problems of demographic decomposition and ageing. Whilst problematic for one, employers see the demographic explosion of Africa – Nigeria alone will host 440 million people in 2050 according to forecasts of the United Nations.

Politics degenerates into emotional storytelling

All the while these substantial problems persist, the status quo tries to seduce voters with rhetoric and imagery language. As I’ve shown in my latest book Democracy and her Media, voters do not receive a coherent set of ideas but are the recipients of associative imagery.[3] The beauty of football matches, successful Olympic Games or recreational life on the terrace are used to distract people from social tensions. The imagery is as follows: pleasure above principle. The Korean-German philosopher Byung-Chul Han, explains how our demise is sold to us as a form of optimism: compulsory positivism with a ‘double-think’ vocabulary where failures are redefined as ‘learning experiences’ and the loss of individual rights are called ‘challenges’. Loss of security is framed as ‘agility’ or ‘flexibility’. The compulsory positivism of society supresses reasonable worries into a taboo: especially the concerns that cause people to think about cultural cohesion and national sovereignty.

We must conclude that Liberalism has the duty to defend the ‘Avondland’ from collapsing. After all, the philosophy of liberalism was born out of the need to defend freedom of thought and speech.

Dr Sid Lukkassen

 

 

 

[1] De Blauwe Tijger, 2017. ALDE Party President Hans van Baalen MEP (VVD) said about this: “A sharp analysis about the influence of the new technologies of communication on the political decision making in Western democracies; at the same time about the ways in which these technologies derail decision making.”

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “THE OCCIDENT AND IDENTITY: TWO YEARS LATER”

  1. I don’t have a PC here and can not reply in detail.

    Just so much:

    I strongly *disagree* with the assumptions in Sid’s text in the liberal words.

    He paints a picture of a Europe that is under siege by “foreign cultures”. This is not the reality in which we live.

    Europeans thrive exactly because we value each person as an individual character, shaped by a million different influences.

    There are +500 million “cultures” in Europe.

    Chris Pyak
    Member of the Steering Committee
    Alde Party Individual Members

    #readyforthenextstep

    Like

  2. Dear Mr. Pyak,

    As Sid’s article so expertly details, this is a matter of Identity (and thus, culture). I see that you prefaced your comment with an explanation for not providing details and understand the best I can hope for is a cursory glance from one of your assistants. Still, I hope I can at least make one of ALDE take off their rose-tinted spectacles, if only for a moment.

    Even if ordinary Europeans did benefit from the increasingly absurd approaches to migration we have taken for the past few decades, Europe and Her nations do not. Even so, the only Europeans who thrive on the mass importation of “foreign cultures” are the political elite who reduce said cultures to labour, entertainment and food – mere trinkets to increase tax revenue and foreign bribes, nothing more.

    Let’s examine the war-torn nations actual refugees (i.e. not economic migrants whom people like you enable to cheat the system) come from. Violent, extreme, fundamental ideologies rule hearts there, to the point a man thinks he will be saved if only he spills the blood of his ‘enemy’. Do you truly believe that with nice words and wishful thinking you can not only curb these psychotic tendencies, but bring about the absolutely united ‘utopia’ your party (and the Soviet Union) desire(d) so much? Do you think you can break the brainwashing these people undergo from birth, and make them the puppet you require for the success of your policies? Do you care what destructive impact your malignant embrace has on the Europeans who are increasingly persecuted, simply for being something ‘other’ to the refugees they are paying to feed and shelter?

    I implore you to go outside and look at the ordinary, working people – not the rich, who are detached from our suffering, nor the career politicians, who smiles and nod to hide their malice. See the natives, who pay the taxes you use for ferry services and media campaigns in support of citizens from states infested with toxic and harmful ideologies. Do they look happy to you? You could ask them if they think “Europeans thrive exactly because we value each person as an individual character, shaped by a million different influences”, though I don’t think you’ll like their answers, given how harrowing those influences are for them.

    Here’s what you will see, for the first time in a long time. Fear, Sorrow and Anger. But you should not be surprised – for it is by the hand of the ‘tolerant’ left they have so much to fear, so much sorrow, and so much to be angry at. They are not allowed to go against the grain you dictate, for they will be ostracised and left at the mercy of the violent gangs you ignore.They are subjected, day after day, night after night, to an endless stream of propaganda that rivals that of the 3rd Reich and Soviet Union. They are living in a time of ever closer union, whether they like it or not, and so a time of unrivalled state intervention, invasive observation and persecution for not agreeing with the ‘tolerant’ left. They are furious that again and again they and their families suffer greatly, yet the statistics are skewed and their stories are actively suppressed if it does not fit with the media’s narrative, all to preserve the illusion you refuse to let go.

    I am nothing special, just someone trying to find his way in life, a student, a son… Yet this is what gives me greater experience than you. for I have had to struggle through the insanity ‘liberals’ want more and more of and, like any who see the dystopia their way secures, I reject it.

    #DefendEurope

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s